This case could have a serious impact on the IRS. There is no law that requires individuals who exchange their labor for money. It’s not a profit; it is an exchange of one thing for another thing.
There is a $250,000+ award for anyone who can prove the income tax applies to most individuals. Good luck with that. If you know the law and the IRS knows you know the law, they will leave you alone. The IRS has lost some cases over this issue and would prefer to not lose more. Just make sure you follow the law, and don’t ever file a false tax return.
I got a couple of letters 20+ years ago. Ignored the first and then called the IRS after the second one. Had a relatively pleasant conversation with what seemed to be a pleasant young man. I explained all this stuff and told him to contact me when he could cite a statute. That’s the last I’ve heard from the IRS.
The IRS would rather leave a guy alone than risk a loss to a guy who knows the law. Not saying people have not been convicted for income tax related crimes, but you damn well better know the law.
Exactly what law are you referring to?
Wascwatch wrote:
“
...
There is no law that requires individuals who exchange their labor for money.
...
“
Can you clarify?
There is no law that requires individuals who exchange their labor for money.
*********
Not sure what you mean but I want to know.
Overturning the Chevron doctrine is just the start of recovering and restoring our Free Constitutional Republic. (We were created to be a “Republic” - a decentralized and representative gov’t, not a “Democracy” - a centralized tyranny of the majority.)
The Chevron doctrine is the tip of the iceberg. 80+% of the federal gov’t is unconstitutional. Among other things, the entire so-called Admirative or Regulatory State is unconstitutional.
Too many people don’t understand what unconstitutional means. The Constitution CREATED the federal government and DELEGATED LIMITED ENUMERATED POWERS to the federal government. If it’s not an enumerated power delegated by the Constitution to the feds, it is no a valid federal power.
The presumption of God-given individual rights, not “gov’t rights”, is in the oft-ignored Declaration of Independence which is persuasive authority to the Constitution inasmuch as it helps to explain constitutional presumptions.
A constitutional gov’t, what we had until the 1900’s, means the gov’t is relatively small honoring the constitutional protection of individual rights against the gov’t. A constitutional gov’t is when the gov’t is afraid of the people.
An unconstitutional gov’t, what we have now, has no bounds and violates individual rights for “gov’t interest” becoming as now, totalitarian threating the lives, liberties, and wellbeing of the people. An unconstitutional gov’t is when the people are afraid of the gov’t.
Under a truly constitutional, small (except military pointed to foreign nations not to its own people) federal gov’t, the IRS would be a storefront.