Trump’s probably election, at this point in time, is causing the court to do what it was supposed to do because his first act will be to grant pardons to every J6R.
It was written with the clear intent to deal with the high profile corporate accounting scandals at the time. Whether it should have been written in the first place is not the point but that mere fact that the government has to use this law as a justification to prosecute J6ers is a farce.
“At issue was a technical reading of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act which stipulates that anyone who “alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so” faces criminal liability.”
Translation: A “Technical” reading means a literal reading of the actual words clearly written”.
Who wrote the dissent, was it Barrett?
I think it means that many J6 convictions are now void. The court is saying that the wording of Sarbanes-Oxley refers to records and paperwork in impeding Government proceedings. But, let’s see if the DOJ is going to do the right thing and start discharging J6 prisoners.
[[anyone who “alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so,]]
Does pelosi ripping up the document she had after Trump’s speech count?
Thousands of lives ruined, families bankrupted, jobs lost....
Let the lawsuits for damages begin.
Someone has made ACB an offer she can’t refuse. She’s finished as an impartial Judge.
Amy Phony Barrett. What a disaster she is becoming.
“”Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined the conservative majority and Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with the liberal dissenters,””
What a flip-flop!!
The DOJ and D.C. judges will twist the words of thise decision to keep prosecuting and imprisoning these patriots.