[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Headline is false. Standing was the issue and the plaintiff’s were all lumped under same umbrella.

[frogjerk]

Correct

[traditional2]

"Standing was the issue and the plaintiff’s were all lumped under same umbrella.

"Standing" is the new way to ignore what The People want, and doing the bidding in the Courts as paid/co-erced/threatened/intimidated to do, by the New World Order.

Since when, in a National Federal Election, do Citizens NOT have Standing when their votes are negated and voices blocked? Is "Standing" ONLY established by those who donate enough $$$$$ to The Agenda, or are a Designated Protected Class?

The coup of 2020 was turned back in the Courts at every turn, by the "Standing" rejections, even where the plain Facts and Evidence was CLEARLY in hand, but no one was allowed to bring a Case. How is "Standing" consistent with the 14th Amendment's "Equal Protection under the Law" Provision?????

[plain talk]

“Headline is false. Standing was the issue and the plaintiff’s were all lumped under same umbrella.”

One has to have their ducks in a row on standing (according to how the Supremes view standing) or the SC is given any easy way out.

[Roadrunner383]

Yup, plaintiffs have to be able to prove they personally were injured when they to court.