Don’t fret over it.
This did nothing to address the merits of the case.
Don’t fret over it.
This did nothing to address the merits of the case.
So, the solution is to find someone with “standing”, have the case wind its way through the courts and three years from now, when probably two of the justices who dissented have retired, let the court have another bite at the apple.
By then, so much information will have been censored, who knows where our nation will stand?
I’m being a bit snarky here. I haven’t yet read the opinion.
You don't get it. The merits don't matter if they rule nobody has standing. You never get to the merits in that case. You're never allowed to present the merits.