[rx]

I referred the reader to aulis.com not because I believe, as a devotee, everything stated, but because they have a lot of interesting stuff that one should consider.

You did not respond to anything I said directly other than to attempt tofurther slather on ridicule without substantively discussing any point at issue. How about trying some discussion for what I said and quoted, e.g. in support of my points from the former NaSA administrator?

[NorthMountain]

Your alleged quote allegedly from "Former NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe" regarding the allegedly "extraordinary radioactivity" beyond low Earth orbit is at odds with reality. Also, the terminology is wrong ... radioactivity is a property of unstable elements. If that quote were genuine, it would refer to a "radiation environment". I am reminded of anti-gun politicians gibbering about "fully semiautomatic assault weapons"; their scrambled terminology betrays that they don't know what they're talking about.

Your final statement in your post:

"No amount of exposure to radiation can be considered safe."

is also at odds with reality.