I’d already added you to the list by default assuming you’d ask to be taken off if you didn’t want to be on the list. LOL
BTW, People on X are pointing out that the Erlinger v. United States decision today could have ramifications with regards to the Trump New York case. Tuxedo had made that point up-thread.
In 6-3 decision issued today, the Supreme Court ruled that 1) a jury must be unanimous in its findings on criminal convictions, and 2) sentencing enhancements cannot be arbitrarily implemented by judicial fiat.
Wow, that’s very interesting. So does that mean Trump’s legal team can file suit based on this ruling perhaps and get it over turn based on that?
In 6-3 decision issued today, the Supreme Court ruled that 1) a jury must be unanimous in its findings on criminal convictions, and 2) sentencing enhancements cannot be arbitrarily implemented by judicial fiat.
Hallelujah!