Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98
Why not? We wanted equality.

Besides, women have played a big part in the last two world wars.

118 posted on 06/20/2024 7:03:27 AM PDT by Churchillspirit (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Churchillspirit

Imagine the next “goldilocks” war where we need millions of fighting troops at the front.

It is “goldilocks” because it is not nuclear war—quick and over—troops not needed....and not too small a brush fire war.

That is what Congress is planning for—using men and women as pawns for their madness.


130 posted on 06/20/2024 11:41:33 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: Churchillspirit; ABN 505

Why not? Because they weaken the military, they don’t strengthen it.

We don’t fill the military with all the men we want and then add some females, we remove a man to put a female in his place.

What combat leader would not want to replace his man warriors with a shorter, lighter, weaker, sicklier, less aggressive, slower moving, more terrain limited, reduced distance traveling, hygienically vulnerable, smaller weight carrying, more prone to injury, version.


132 posted on 06/20/2024 1:17:08 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson