Man who identifies rapes woman who identifies as a man ...
1. A he that identifies as a she rapes a she who identifies as a he. That is a bit odd.
2. That means the he that identifies as a she has a functional Johnson. Does that not mean she is really a he?
3. The she that identifies as a he has something left to rape. The physiology defies me and I aced that course.
4. If the he identifying as a she raped the she identifying as a he during the rape did the former identify himself as a he as he raped the she identifying as a he? Thus it could be just rape otherwise it is homosexual rape.
Pity the poor prosecutor that needs to clarify all this in charges and in court. I am now going to pour myself a drink and try an make some sense of my post.