Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Thatcher

I would have agreed with you — until Bragg himself made the case for broad immunity.


73 posted on 06/14/2024 12:51:49 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Sidebar Moderator

You just can’t have 2,500 DAs filing charges against ex-presidents. Think of the potential for extortion.


74 posted on 06/14/2024 12:53:50 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Sidebar Moderator
I would have agreed with you — until Bragg himself made the case for broad immunity.

The Supremes are not ruling on Bragg. They will issue a narrow ruling on process at this point, eating up the clock with the trial court being forced to flesh out the immunity arguments on the record. THEN the appeal will come back to SCOTUS.

This is excellent. Every legal "expert" dismissed Trump's position that he had immunity out of hand. But the Supremes are forcing courts to take Trump's arguments utterly seriously.

77 posted on 06/14/2024 1:15:56 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson