1 posted on
06/12/2024 6:23:47 AM PDT by
george76
To: george76
Expect more reductions, since those who had a psychological need to buy an EV already have them.
2 posted on
06/12/2024 6:30:12 AM PDT by
BobL
To: george76
3 posted on
06/12/2024 6:32:19 AM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
To: george76
Is the business world signaling an expectation of Trump taking in the WH? Maybe the carmakers are doing less tooling up to produce EV’s in part because there’s lower demand, and in part because they expect less government EV coercion.
4 posted on
06/12/2024 6:45:48 AM PDT by
Tell It Right
(Galatians 6:14 -- May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ...)
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
5 posted on
06/12/2024 6:55:01 AM PDT by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=30%>)
To: george76
In boardrooms of Ford, GM and Chrysler:
“Let’s Go Brandon!”
“Let’s Go Brandon”
“Let’s Go Brandon”
6 posted on
06/12/2024 6:57:57 AM PDT by
MCSETots
( )
To: george76
They would be wise to trim it down to nothing. How many have burned up already?
To: george76
Market share may grow from 7% to 8% but that’s not much in numerical terms. The EV boosters will cheer it on as a 14% growth rate though. 10% market share is wildly optimistic.
To: george76
EV’s are not on a continuous upward curve. People who want them have already got them.
18 posted on
06/12/2024 9:57:49 AM PDT by
lurk
(u)
To: george76
The unwritten story is that many car dealers won’t take EVs as trade-ins.
19 posted on
06/12/2024 12:01:06 PM PDT by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson