Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

Is it even possible to lift and aim a weapon with a 200-round magazine? That great a weight would hamper the capability to move through underbrush with any degree of stealth, and would only be appropriate if in a fixed location where the weapon could be supported by some kind of tripod.


14 posted on 06/11/2024 1:52:59 PM PDT by alloysteel (Most people slog through life without ever knowing the wonders of true insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel

Sure they could 550 box of 22s aint that heavy


51 posted on 06/11/2024 2:17:52 PM PDT by al baby (I know sarcasm )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel

The Beta C magazine for the M16 and certain HKs holds 100 rounds.

It apparently worked well at a test in Ft. Bliss and not so well in Afghanistan using British ammo.

Seems like it would be damn heavy.


64 posted on 06/11/2024 2:29:41 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel

“Is it even possible to lift and aim a weapon with a 200-round magazine?”

According to Gun Zone, 100 rds. of 5.56 ammo weighs approximately 3.7 lbs. So 200 rds. would be 7.4 lbs. not counting the weight of the magazine and the weapon itself. So without any accoutrements, (red dot, light, and whatever else) you are looking at probably 12 lbs. for the system. Not horribly heave, but I wouldn’t want to lug it around for hours on end.


92 posted on 06/11/2024 3:57:44 PM PDT by DaiHuy (I support LGBTQ. (Lets Get Biden to Quit.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson