Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle
Worst case for Trump. The judge question jurors, and decides that the jury reached a verdict on X (any number from 1-33) counts before the juror spoke to her cousin, declares a mistrial on those counts, and enters a final judgment on X counts. That would:
1. Leave Trump a convicted felon,
2. Force Trump to spend time and money on an appeal,
3. Leave Trump facing felony charges in the trial court,
4. Leave Trump under the trial court gag order, and
5. Force Trump to spend time and money on the retrial of the remaining charges, which the judge could schedule before the election.
48 posted on 06/07/2024 7:37:06 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pilsner

Judge declares mistrial on counts where he finds jury had not reached a verdict before the juror spoke to her cousin.


49 posted on 06/07/2024 7:48:43 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Pilsner

Stupid. A mistrial means none of that happens.


52 posted on 06/07/2024 8:12:49 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson