Skip to comments.
President Trump calls on Supreme Court to act
Truth Social ^
| Jun 02, 2024
| Donald J. Trump
Posted on 06/02/2024 4:55:46 PM PDT by McGruff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
1
posted on
06/02/2024 4:55:46 PM PDT
by
McGruff
To: McGruff
Plays into the hands of the leftists who hate SCOTUS.
To: DIRTYSECRET
Still...it’s gotta be done. His lawyers need to take whatever action is necessary to move the appeal up to the USSC.
3
posted on
06/02/2024 5:02:24 PM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
To: RoosterRedux
Yes the New York appeals court is hopelessly corrupted and will present a delay that will create irrevocable harm to the accused.
4
posted on
06/02/2024 5:05:25 PM PDT
by
Samurai_Jack
(This is not about hypocrisy, this is about hierarchy!)
To: Samurai_Jack
And any action on the part of the USSC will not be politically biased...just legally fair.
5
posted on
06/02/2024 5:09:25 PM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
To: DIRTYSECRET
6
posted on
06/02/2024 5:09:29 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
To: RoosterRedux
Yep, it totally has to happen. SCOTUS must act.
7
posted on
06/02/2024 5:10:09 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Georgia Girl 2
SCOTUS must act.And given the nature of the issue, I think they can act fast.
8
posted on
06/02/2024 5:12:02 PM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
To: RoosterRedux
Yes I do not expect the appellate court to be involved in this. Its totally a SCOTUS situation.
9
posted on
06/02/2024 5:14:03 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Georgia Girl 2
10
posted on
06/02/2024 5:16:00 PM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
To: Georgia Girl 2
What, about this specific case, REMOTELY gives the USSC jurisdiction before NY appeals are done?
Nothing, is what.
11
posted on
06/02/2024 5:16:41 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: All
Indict Joe, after he leaves office, or Hillary - and SCOTUS has an emergency session in hours.
John Roberts ran the FISA Court when they framed Trump regarding Russia to listen to him and his kids.
12
posted on
06/02/2024 5:18:26 PM PDT
by
OakOak
(Misinformation Campaign on your TV)
To: Jim Noble
It’s a federal case that was unlawfully decided by a corrupt Kangaroo Court in New York.
13
posted on
06/02/2024 5:19:12 PM PDT
by
Kleon
To: RoosterRedux
AGREED. THE SUPREME COURT MUST ACT.
THIS WHOLE TRIAL AND ITS CONDUCT BY A CONFLICTED JUDGE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
DONT CARE IF IT UPSETS THE COMMUNISTS AND LIBERALS.
THE DEMOCRATS AND THEIR COMMUNIST FRIENDS ARE,EVIL.
VOTE DEMOCRATS OUT.
14
posted on
06/02/2024 5:19:37 PM PDT
by
Pearfect
(Ou can't beat the competition lock them )
To: Jim Noble
And what is your legal expertise?
15
posted on
06/02/2024 5:19:55 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
To: RoosterRedux
With our system of division of powers, it is clear the Ajudicatory Power has become corrupted by this Lawfare practice and the SC since its early days has guarded the power to police its own limits. It will not want the Legislative branch to attempt a remedy. The Chief Justice is very much an activist on this power and will side with members wishing to take an active role IMHO.
16
posted on
06/02/2024 5:20:01 PM PDT
by
KC Burke
To: McGruff
The question remains unanswered: by what mechanism could the SC intervene?
To: McGruff
The SC needs to get off its ass. This is why they exist.
18
posted on
06/02/2024 5:27:05 PM PDT
by
HYPOCRACY
(Brandon's pronouns: Xi/Hur)
To: DIRTYSECRET
Who cares? It’s not like they’ll be ok with the Supremes if he said nothing. And they have made it clear they intend to remake and expand the court if they get both houses and the White House.
So it’s an act of protecting the Supreme Court itself for them to take this case. If they fail to stop this outrageous national judicial tyranny that affects the entire nation, they have no purpose remaining.
19
posted on
06/02/2024 5:28:51 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
To: Samurai_Jack
“and will present a delay that will create irrevocable harm to the accused.”
And the nation.
20
posted on
06/02/2024 5:29:31 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson