Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GulliverSwift
That’s a logical fallacy. A blind squirrel can find and nut.

A stopped clock can be right twice a day, but news liars like the Washington Post are reliably lying every single minute of every single day.

They have lied so much, that anything they say should be construed as a lie. There is this long founded legal principle:

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

If it's a logical fallacy, you need to hurry up and tell all the courts in the nation, because that is the rule they follow.

113 posted on 06/01/2024 3:09:18 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

You cannot refute these 100% true facts:
1) Dinesh said various disputed statements
2) Many people have evaluated those statements and showed that they are false or unproveable
3) Dinesh has not debated with these critics
4) Dinesh’s financiers said the film was going to be pulled for inaccuracies

If Dinesh had real proof, he would have debated the critics. His statements were easily disproven. And he used a Moscow map as if it were from Georgia. This is blatant lying.

No one cited 2000 Mules in their court briefs, because they know it is not a solid piece of work. Only amateurs with no legal background think it’s legit.


118 posted on 06/01/2024 3:17:21 PM PDT by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson