MAGA Continues to November, Stronger Than Ever
Posted on 05/31/2024 2:44:36 PM PDT by Jane Long
Oh, it should have gone to Lakeside Granny’s video @ 20. Sorry.
Sounds pretty accurate to me.
He’s a vessel for sure.
Yes, I found that article too.
Didn’t bother to read because the title told me all I needed to know about the snarky article.
Glad you posted the link to the entire “episode”. No way it can be taken out of context! And, his dazed and confused look, after his evil grin, was also telling.
Evil and out of it, from minute to minute.
Thanks.
I found the Nat Review article, but, it’s behind a paywall 🙃
I’m NOT a NR/NT member, so, I can’t read entire article. It was linked, in the snarky article (I posted, upthread).
Trump’s Trial Has Already Damaged the Office of the Presidency
By JOHN YOO
May 29, 2024 2:37 PM
To limit and undo that damage and restore the rule of law, Republicans may have no choice but to respond in kind.
~~SNIP~~
Repairing this breach of constitutional norms will require Republicans to follow the age-old maxim: Do unto others as they have done unto you. In order to prevent the case against Trump from assuming a permanent place in the American political system, Republicans will have to bring charges against Democratic officers, even presidents. A Republican DA will have to charge Hunter Biden for fraud or corruption for taking money from foreign governments. Another Republican DA will have to investigate Joe Biden for influence-peddling at the behest of a son who received payoffs from abroad. Only retaliation in kind can produce the deterrence necessary to enforce a political version of mutual assured destruction; without the threat of prosecution of their own leaders, Democrats will continue to charge future Republican presidents without restraint.
Tit for tat will produce benefits beyond shoring up executive independence. While pursuing their political self-interest, Republicans will generate the greater social benefit of repairing the rule of law. Whether it results in a conviction or acquittal, the Trump trial underscores a fact not often appreciated by the public. The rule of law — in this case, the idea that like cases should be treated alike — depends today on executive leaders as much as it does on the courts. It is the executive branch of the federal government, headed by an elected president, that bears the responsibility to “take care that the laws are faithfully executed.” It is the attorneys general of the states and the elected district attorneys of cities and counties that hold the power of law enforcement. The executive branch of the federal and state governments decides whom to investigate and prosecute long before a judge ever sees the case.
As Robert Jackson, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s attorney general and later Supreme Court justice declared in a speech that is still considered the greatest statement of prosecutorial ethics, “the prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.” He or she enjoys the unchecked discretion simply to have someone investigated, which can ruin one’s reputation and destroy one’s finances. A prosecutor can present one-sided evidence to a grand jury, win an indictment, and have someone held for trial. Under the principle of prosecutorial discretion, courts do not review a prosecutor’s choice of a particular suspect for investigation or deliberate whether the government could have spent its time and resources on more deserving targets.
Read whole article......
Saw this ...
Wonder if he’s going to RAV?
🤔
Good morning, dear Jane.
Perhaps Bolling will follow Grant Stinchfield to RAV.
Meanwhile, Bannon & MTG are making me a nervous wreck right now with talk of our RPOTUS likely being locked up and of him being replaced at the RNC or at least forced to accept Birdbrain as VEEP.
There, MTG goes again
The reason why we are where we are today is because the demonrats have never been charged with all the crimes they have committed.
We all know this.
It has only emboldened them.
As Bannon just said, we need to go Old Testament on them.
Good morning, edie!
I hope Trump Team goes scorched earth, at the RNC convention...NO Birdbrain!! NO DeeSwampus!!
And.....I hope Team Trump joins forces with True the Vote, who already have a national framework in place, to GOTV.
As Bannon just said, we need to go Old Testament on them.
Exactly.
It needs to be Biblical.
AMEN!!
Thank you for posting the APV link, for all. 🛐
Armstrong Economics ^ | 1 June 24 | Martin Armstrong
Posted on 6/1/2024, 7:15:06 AM by delta7
Juan Manuel Merchan is a Colombian-born American judge and former prosecutor. Most curious, he is NOT a formal judge, he is ONLY an acting justice of the New York State Supreme Court in New York County. How did a former prosecutor who is NOT a formal judge get assigned this case? This is not just a possible rigged proceeding, but this is UNCONSTITUTIONAL insofar as the alleged crime is a federal crime when there is no subject matter jurisdiction by this ACTING JUDGE in a state court to preside over a federal crime.
Now this ACTING Judge will be sentencing Trump where the maximum fine if $5,000 per count but he could sentence Trump to 4 years for every count. This UNCONSTITUTIONAL sentencing is a disgrace to the rule of law and the comments from overseas institutions and governments coming in to me personally are appalled at this entire proceeding.
The ACTING judge Merchan is a disgrace to the legal profession and his bias was clear by imposing a GAG order only on Trump but not on the prosecution's witnesses. That is UNPRECEDENTED and a joke. He will now sentence Trump on July 11th, 2024 and this politically and morally corrupt Judge has carved his name in American history. This has shown that our legal system is so corrupt and biased that the entire system should be scrapped and all judges simply fired.
History is littered with corrupt judges like Merchan who always assume they are above the law like this ACTING judge and former prosecutor. In China, the historian Sima Qian provides us with a look at one of the most harsh bureaucrats of the Wudi reign, Du Zhou (? – 95BC), who argued that the old laws were then irrelevant and could be changed at the pleasure of the emperor. Zang Tang (? – 116BC) A judicial bureaucrat named Wno drafted the laws under Wudi regime and made treasonous thoughts (CONSPIRACY) punishable by death. When the regimes changed, he was eventually compelled to commit suicide as his view of the law led him to be the most hated among all of the ministers under Wudi regime.....
(MUCH more, at link) ...
BTTT!!
Thx, foldy....awesome, as always.
The more you indict - the more we unite.
Pass it on.— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) June 1, 2024
Thank you for posting the APV.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
