Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/30/2024 3:04:54 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: zeestephen

” the judge might instead opt for a sentence of house arrest”

BULL. This judge has already show he is unstoppable and will do what he wants. Trump is going to Rikers and then some state Prison to keep him off the campaign trail.


103 posted on 05/30/2024 5:33:10 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

The actual banana republic FOREIGN “jurist” Juan Merchan will handcuff PDJT for the media and for as long as possible.

-fJRoberts-


107 posted on 05/30/2024 5:35:26 PM PDT by A strike (no tyranny that cannot be justified by 'climate change')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

From Mark Levin on X:

Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow

Thinking further out loud

The issue is how to get out of the New York system and bring the case to the Supreme Court, which may or may not take it up. That is why I look to Bush v Gore, where the S Ct decided to step in BECAUSE it was a presidential election. There was another court involved, the Florida Supreme Court. And it was that court that the Supreme Court believed was violating the Equal Protection Clause. That was the doctrine it settled on, given the unequal treatment of voters.

In New York, you would file the notice of appeal, ask for a stay of the trial court, and seek expedited review. You need to protect your ability to timely appeal and not abandon it. You might then file applications for common law writs with the US Supreme Court, where the S Ct can take action if it chooses, and legitimately claim the harm is immediate and ongoing not just to a presidential candidate, but to the federal electoral system, federal campaign jurisdiction (reverse federalism), and the precedent that might otherwise be set and spread throughout the country. The denial of due process infected every aspect of the case.

The S Ct has common law powers (common law writs — judicially created not statutorily created) it uses very sparingly, in extraordinary circumstances, to grant relief. Waiting would compound the problem. The problem now is that every day that goes by, the actions by the NY lower court bleeds into the federal, presidential election system.

Where does this end? Will other DA’s use the Bragg-Merchan precedent, such as it is, going forward, and not care what higher state courts have to say, in that those courts may not act quickly or at all. So, now local prosecutors and state judges will intervene in presidential elections or any federal election.

We need to give the Supreme Court the opportunity to intervene. If it chooses not to, then it won’t.

But between Jack Smith criminalizing election challenges to the point that we do not know what is or is not legal, and now Bragg and Merchan criminalizing events and activities that are not illegal, to the point we don’t now know what they are, the Supreme Court, in my view, must do something.

In the end, the S Ct will not be able to avoid this forever. Better to deal with now than later, when it will get worse.


108 posted on 05/30/2024 5:35:36 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

It’s time to Burn loot and mob. (BLM). This is crazy If we take this we will be loaded up next.


137 posted on 05/30/2024 8:31:31 PM PDT by wgmalabama (Censored!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson