Umtil the prosecution specifies the crime, the defense cannot refute. They STILL haven’t specified the crime.
MortMan wrote:
“
Umtil the prosecution specifies the crime, the defense cannot refute. They STILL haven’t specified the crime.
“
Mbrfl said
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4241127/posts?page=335#335
“The prosecution never specified what that felony was until closing arguments and even then they gave jurors an option of 3 to choose from”
So, was there no time to rebut?
Someone sprang an October surprise on the defense...
Is that proper procedure?
Is that a basis for appeal (as well as the other dubious stuff the prosecutor & judge did).