Excellent insight. I wonder how common that is in other New York Court rooms.? In such a complex case, it is obvious the judge is trying to cause confusion for a specific result. I’ve skim read the jury instructions, which are conveniently posted online, and there’s no way a non-legal person could comprehend all of that, by listening to it, nor, reading it just once.
So by them asking for a rehash of the testimonies of Pecker and Cohen, is that good or bad? Was there something in those testimonies that were incredibly incriminating Trump that will help them convict Trump? Honestly, I have not been paying close attention to those testimonies by P and C so I’m confused because I thought Trump’s defense destroyed Cohen. And why would they need a refresher of the testimonies? I am so confused besides being infuriated and pissed off like never before I don’t understand a lot of this.