An obvious sign that somebody on the jury thinks they can find Trump guilty, despite the lack of a unanimity.
“Obviously someone on this jury was not listening during my instructions. Let me make simple enough that all of you can understand. The Orange Demon is guilty of something. It doesn’t matter what. It could be jaywalking or scuffing up Biden’s desk before he had a chance to sit in it. Now go back and convict the SOB and don’t come back until you’ve done it. Bailiff lock these jurors in the deliberation room. Turn the air conditioning on high and don’t let them out until they give me a guilty verdict. Don’t feed them or give them water either. Alternate juror you are still on standby in case I need to throw someone off the jury” tghus spoke Judge Merchan.
Not necessarily. A common issue with jurors is the meaning of “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” The concept can be elusive in that it does not mean no doubt whatever, nor does it mean that you think someone did wrong. It means that the evidence that heard as a jury is so clear and persuasive that it leaves no reasonable doubt of guilt in the mind of any juror.