No. I said if this was Hunter’s case with the exact same events, he wouldn’t be saying the same things about it.
One might tell the poster that with that kind of “explanation” specifying “the exact same events” that if his aunt had balls, it would be his uncle.
Given the content of that post to you, that just might be very true.
Aside from that totally inane element of your argument, your claim is a counterfactual conditional.
Counterfactual conditionals can be useful mental exercises. For example theorizing what would have happened if the outcome of a war had been different. Counterfactual conditionals can be based on analytical thinking.
OTOH, your counterfactual conditional is simply making things up. It doesn't follow from any empirical data.
In addition to being made up, it does not address anything Mark Levin actually said about this bizarre situation. It has no relevance to anything. It seems your counterfactual is intended to change the subject.
Hunter committed actual crimes. Hunter was given a pass on a slam-dunk tax evasion case.
Trump, the Cleanest Guy in The DC Swamp, didn't commit any crimes at all.
He was dragged into Democrat jurisdictions and given a taste of Pure Democracy - of the Democrats, by the Democrats and for the Democrats. Mob rule and a lynching*, in other words.
How DARE you defend that sort of behavior on a forum based on our Representative Republic, all while pretending to be a conservative?
Excellent analysis of a counterfactual conditional in your post #64, BTW, lasereye.
I think you may have noticed that lots of posters around here seem to have your number, joesbucks.
You gonna opus out a 27-year-old FR account defending some cartel stooge & vile wetback cur who is abusing the American legal system for his political party, cucks? Hmmmmmmmmm?
*seems like you and your Democrat Party pals have always liked a little lynching when it comes to your political enemies, joescucks. Things haven't changed with your ilk in over 175 years...