[kiryandil]

because as we're seeing now in this and in Engeron's case, one cannot take it for granted that the court has the best interests of justice at heart.

Note how he's pretending that the New York judiciary is objective in the matter of Trump.

Heck, we have the New York state legislature passing a bill of attainder against Trump, the corrupt governor Hochul signing it, knowing full well what it was - then after it was used as a nuke against Trump, the self-same piece of cr@p governor rushes out to reassure business people in New York that the bill of attainder was only going to be used on Trump.

Our "FRiend" here is pretending that the entire process in New Jerk state is on the up-and-up.

We don't have to accept his conclusions that are derived from his "devious streak" in this discussion.

[Political Junkie Too]

There was also the ex post facto law that extended the statute of limitations on rape that was used to bring the Carroll case against Trump.

I would think that extending the statute of limitations should only apply to future crimes, not past crimes that were committed under a different statute of limitations.

-PJ