I’m claiming that Levin may be doing the same.
Regarding "the game of providing innuendo," I suggest that you read my manifesto on my home page. I agree with you on this point more than you might think.
Regarding Levin, you have the right to claim whatever you want. You just can't claim that "we all know" it too.
Now that you've stated your belief that Levin is trolling the other side, I can't really say. I can only point out what I said before that Levin points to his time as Chief of Staff for Attorney General Ed Meese and I'd lean towards believing that Levin wouldn't want to taint that CV by engaging in misinformation.
That would be like having former a U.S. Attorney like Andrew McCarthy or professors like Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley going on Twitter to make taunts at the other side and then go on television claiming to be an expert opinion on the law.
Levin has talked about Joe Biden's likelihood of being indicted for the documents case (before Tur declined to press charges), but Levin was consistent that a sitting President can't be indicted while in office per DoJ policy.
I can't recall what Levin said about Hunter Biden's personal legal cases, but he's not running for President so it can't really be compared to what Levin has said about Trump.
What I will go out on a limb and say is that since never before has a former President been taken to trial during his campaign for a second term in office by the incumbent President's party, the same can be said for the pundits who are reporting on it. They're all making it up as they go, some are doing it better than others, others (like Lawrence O'Donnell are "psyoping" an alternative reality of what's going on. I don't listen to Levin as much as I used to when I was commuting, but what I recall is that he's always stayed within his lane.
-PJ