Can you explain your thinking on why Levin's legal opinion would be situational?
Levin often (if not always) bases his legal opinions on his experience as the Chief of Staff of former Attorney General Ed Meese, his time as a law clerk for 5th circuit Court of Appeals Judge Will Garwood, and his work for his Landmark Legal Foundation.
What can you point to that suggests that Levin's opinions are partisan?
-PJ
Excellent post. :)
Do you believe he’d be providing the same cover for the Biden’s or the Clinton’s should all other elements of the cases were being applied against them?
His cult leaders told him so. How dare you question that?