Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

What states don’t have is something like the electoral college.
That was designed to offset the power of cities.
The founders knew how how cities fuck$d up their countries.


38 posted on 05/22/2024 5:51:06 PM PDT by rellic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rellic

States DID have the rough equivalent of the Electoral College. Maybe you know that, but the wording isn’t clear.

For the benefit of those who do not, the idea was that large population centers in a state could not dominate the rest of the state. Sound familiar? Well it should. That’s why a 1/3 of Oregon wants to Join Idaho.

It was decided by SCOTUS (who else probably the Warren regime), “One Man One Vote” and that, as they say, was the end of that.

It’s important to know History, because while a lot of people know things are FUBAR, they don’t know *why* or *how* things got FUBAR. This was a calculated move to knock off one of the timbers that made this country function.

The EC and the Senate are others, obviously. They wanted Mob Rule, and they got it. They aren’t going to stop now.


42 posted on 05/22/2024 6:15:37 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson