I think people are taking the work “engage” out of context and blowing the lethal force warning out of proportion. This looks to be a fill in the blanks planning document. This is probably what they are supposed to do every time there is a high risk search warrant issued using federal agents.
Probably true. But why would the FBI handle this situation so, should I say, dramatically? Let's face it. This is literally the weaponization of the most powerful law enforcement agency in the country against a political foe.
So, did they have the same ‘fill in the blank’ shoot 46 orders when they raided his home in Delaware?
Yep, "engage" can mean as little as "engaging in conversation with PDJT staff/PDJT RE: why we are here serving a search warrant".
GP/Hoft: "gotta hype the headline for click/ad bucks!!"
Wait a minute. Did they actually state this was a, "High risk" search warrant?
??