Where were the warrants? Who approved the warrants? Were the approvals made at the highest levels of government meaning the WH? This is not a Banana Republic, yet. The FBI cannot simply enter a POTUS’s house looking for boxes with files, rummage through them and make fake pictures using SWAT tactics. Especially in light of the following:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4236500/posts
From Julie Kelly:
In what must be considered not only an act of doctoring evidence but willfully misleading the American people into believing the former president is a criminal and threat to national security, agents involved in the raid attached the cover sheets to at least seven files to stage the photo.
Classified cover sheets were not “recovered” in the container, contrary to Bratt’s declaration to the court. In fact, after being busted recently by defense attorneys for mishandling evidence in the case, Bratt had to fess up about how the cover sheets actually ended up on the documents.
Kelly quotes Jay Bratt, who was serving as the lead DOJ prosecutor on the investigation at the time of the raid and is now on special counsel Jack Smith's team. Originally, he claimed in an August 2022 court filing, “[Thirteen] boxes or containers contained documents with classification markings, and in all, over one hundred unique documents with classification markings… were seized. Certain of the documents had colored cover sheets indicating their classification status.”
His story, however, has changed. He now says, “[If] the investigative team found a document with classification markings, it removed the document, segregated it, and replaced it with a placeholder sheet. The investigative team used classified cover sheets for that purpose.”
Why did the The FBI demand Mara-a-Lago’s cameras be turned off. Trump's staff refused.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-fbi-maralago-raid-cameras-b2146398.html
FBI Confirms It's Restarting Online Censorship Efforts Ahead Of 2024 Election
Has Leftist Lawfare Created the Police State Yet?
You need to be questioning the constitutionality of the FBI's actions.
The title of the article is false. No American, LEO or not, needs pre-authorization to use deadly force when faced with suffering death or severe bodily harm. The Constitution gives us the right to use it.
Was deadly force used in this situation? No it wasn’t because no one was in a position where the criteria was met.