[Mariner]

“Seriously, where is it written that Russia gets to start a war against anyone and those people don’t get to hit back at Russia?”

You’re asking the wrong question...again.

The right question to ask is: How are US interests served by giving Ukraine permission to use US tactical missiles to strike mainland Russia?

Answer that one.

[Obadiah]

These people are quite literally hell-bent on war. I have never heard Nuland or any of these other Democrat warmongers ever talk about a diplomatic solution, or peace, or a negotiated settlement. Never once. They love war. They want war and destruction, just like their father.

[Allegra]

Hey, at least she finally admitted to being anti-American. Most of these zeepers are foreigners who hate Americans. I’ve been saying it all along.

Mariner says: “There’s more than one anti American, Ukrainian partisan on this site that supports her position 100%. And they’ll be on this thread.”

Zeeper responds: “You rang?”

[wildcard_redneck]

"The right question to ask is: How are US interests served by giving Ukraine permission to use US tactical missiles to strike mainland Russia?
Answer that one."

I'm pretty certain that she cannot.

[freeandfreezing]

I am sorry that your Russian feelings are hurt. The best way that Russia can avoid further damage is to withdraw from Ukraine. Invading other countries isn't something one can do without consequences.

If the USA hadn't disarmed Ukraine in the 1990s Putin would never have been able to invade it in 2014 or now.

Providing weapons to Ukraine so that they can defend themselves is appropriate for any nation including the USA since it helps deter tyrants like Putin from attacking their neighbors.

Russians want to hide behind their border and launch rockets at Ukraine. Why shouldn't Ukraine shoot back?

It is in the best interest of the US and every other nation to provide arms so that nations can defend themselves from invasion.