That's getting subjective with the term "admitted," but then so were the authors of the piece.
In this political environment, the CDC, knowing that they were NEVER to be allowed to make an admission as direct as you would apparently prefer, is still under huge pressure to respond to the mounting data from other sources indicating that the vax is nowhere near as safe as they had touted. Releasing the data to the OECD was therefore a tacit admission to be celebrated, whether you want something more explicit or not. Hence, for you to narrow your interpretation and thereby declare what I wrote as "repeating the lie," is hyperbolic in the least.
I'm grateful for ANY data on this getting out from the CDC and welcome its propagation despite the stupidly inflated number in the report. So many people died needlessly (or should I say "were murdered"?) and so many more are developing predicted and possibly catastrophic symptoms on global scale that my hope the thugs who pushed this for power, money, and "population control" will tolerate such hyperventilations. I shudder to think the cost the United States would bear for having released and promoted this spike protein via an apparently tainted mRNA technology. Over the last few years I have studied the origins and purposes of that supporting population control agenda, and am well into writing a book on the topic with 35pp of references and considerably more footnotes than pages.
I lost one of my best friends and one of the world's finest wildlife biologists, Dr. Valerius Geist, likely due to the vax. Val was a diabetic who suffered a severe cardiac blockage within days of injection, soon followed with a blown aorta. Dr. Geist was bringing the results of the pivotal ecological work done here to the world in his keynote speeches. It meant a lot to me and to human liberty (for reasons I won't divulge just yet), work that stands as physical proof that the population control agenda carries with it an ecologically catastrophic backlash.
“That’s getting subjective with the term “admitted,” but then so were the authors of the piece.”
I was absolutely objective. The authors outright lied.