Replies

thanks for the post george76. looks like some of the usual jab-asses are here slinging away at the headline, ignoring the underlying data.

good to see some summary CDC? data on all cause excess deaths for 2020/2021, especially for young adults. the all cause excess mortality data is interesting (especially from multiple countries like sweden and israel), and the US data seems to be in the ball park with other data i’ve seen (e.g., Ed Dowd, etc.). so out of curiosity (the killer jab is old news to me), i took a longer look on this tonight.

i’ll ignore the sensational title which seems to have little to do with either the article or the underlying data from stats.oecd.org, but i was able to export/import the data from the embedded link, which, stripping out the American data, looks very bad for those who took or are still taking the jab. and deaths from these jabs, as horrible as that is, have to be a small part of the disaster for those who are alive and suffering adverse effects from the same.

imo, this data for the under 44 age group does show a big jump in excess deaths over the ‘average’ increase from 2020 to 2021. 2020 looks like a plateau. then, 2022 through 2023 seems to show a big decrease in excess deaths and a return to the long term average, even though wuflu was still going strong we are told in 2023.

i make out big jumps at the end of 2020 (first rollouts of the jab, we saw it as early as nov at our hospital for docs and first responders), at the beginning of 2021 (general public) and at really big jump in the middle of 2021 (summer).

i get about a 63K increase in raw number of excess deaths from 2020 to 2021 in young adults (<44).

using their excess deaths increase/decrease data over an average they computed, i get an average increase of about 5X over 2020 in 2021. which is astounding, and agrees with other data sets i’ve seen.

so, i do accept some of the article’s claims—that if the jab was working those excess death and average increase/decrease excess death numbers should have reasonably at gone down or at least stayed about the same as 2020—not jump 5 fold. this data, imho, supports the theory that the introduction of the jab in the US in late 2020 was killing many more young people than wuflu alone. i mean, just look at the arc of the data over 4 years.

caveats: i looked at their overall mortality data and it seemed a bit light to me. i recall that i estimated the number of deaths in the US at about 2M a year and this data seems to have less than 1M. i didn’t find any data under the <2020 selections in the set (what gives there since they have the dropdowns for 2019, 2018, etc. so i can’t get much of a feel for how they computed their average increase/decrease in excess deaths per week, year over year.

note: i think many of us who are interested in treating numbers truthfully should download what we can, now, because it looks like it may be going away according to the site.