Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird
Yep. That was an act of bad faith on his part. Courts take a very dim view of that especially when you then try to seek relief.

"Saw construction going on..."

"Honest, Your Honor! Sure, I was a little puzzled for a moment, but then I just assumed that I must be mistaken. It was late at night, and raining heavily, my glasses were broken, and I had a stye in my left eye."

Unless the Plaintiff acted in a ridiculous fashion, ostentatiously taking photographs, hitting the bars afterwards and bragging to everyone about the "big windfall" coming his way, it's impossible to prove - and he is under absolutely no obligation to "follow up" on any slight suspicion that might have momentarily crossed his mind.

Regards,

69 posted on 05/15/2024 9:12:36 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek
Unless the Plaintiff acted in a ridiculous fashion, ostentatiously taking photographs, hitting the bars afterwards and bragging to everyone about the "big windfall" coming his way, it's impossible to prove - and he is under absolutely no obligation to "follow up" on any slight suspicion that might have momentarily crossed his mind.,/p>

When you're asking a court for equitable relief, you have a duty to mitigate the damages. If you sit back and let the damages get worse.....ie let them go on building that house on your property.....that is what courts take a very dim view of. That's when they're likely to not give you some kind of windfall you were presumably seeking.

72 posted on 05/15/2024 9:49:01 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson