“”California is proposing to give them the right to vote””
Kalifornia passed the DMV Motor Voter ordinance many moons ago. If you interact with the DMV for any purpose (license ID, registration) you are automatically signed up on the voter rolls. A few years after the Motor Voter began, illegal trespassers were allowed to obtain a ‘legal’ Kalifornia driver’s license. No discussion of voter registration, but you know the DemocRATS are signing them up in droves. El RushBo stated that many of the Kalifornia 2016 votes for Hillary were no doubt illegals.
Just so. “Motor voter” law mean illegals get to vote. That’s why it was passed in the first place.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled A population boom is reshaping this 'affordable' California region, Ronaldus Magnus III wrote: “”California is proposing to give them the right to vote””
Kalifornia passed the DMV Motor Voter ordinance many moons ago. If you interact with the DMV for any purpose (license ID, registration) you are automatically signed up on the voter rolls. A few years after the Motor Voter began, illegal trespassers were allowed to obtain a ‘legal’ Kalifornia driver’s license. No discussion of voter registration, but you know the DemocRATS are signing them up in droves. El RushBo stated that many of the Kalifornia 2016 votes for Hillary were no doubt illegals.
According to a county person, the counties work hard to put every illegal on Medi-Cal (i.e., California's version of Medicaid). They offer regular annual childhood exams and other regular doctor services - not just emergency needs. Who wouldn't go to Kalifornia if you knew you could give your family free medical care.
Illegals in the program were under a 'Dreamers' program, but when that program was rescinded, they removed the classification from the illegal's records.
Once an illegal was signed up with Medi-Cal, they automatically received a voter's registration. It was mandated that ALL signees of Medicaid receive a voter's registration, illegal or not. I asked 'why? If they are not allowed to vote - won't that confuse them? And he said that they relied on the recipient to know whether or not they vote and therefore whether or not to register???