“On cross Cohen is going to pay for taping his client.Even the jury should be able to put themselves in Trumps position.”
You’re kidding.... right? You really think this jury wasn’t chosen to be just as anti-Trump as this judge and the DA is? I’m thinking the “guilty” verdict has been a ‘no-brainer’ from the very beginning of this fiasco.
The LAAP-dog media made a lot of noise about two lawyers being on the jury and how they may become "super jurors" because of their knowledge of the law. The thought was that the other jurors would defer to the lawyers in a sort of "The Runaway Jury" situation.
If it is clear that there is no case here, that the law was misapplied, that Bragg failed to meet the threshold of proving his case, that there is no underlying crime that that bootstrapped the expired misdemeanors, that the legal expenses were properly booked as legals expenses, and that President Trump was not personally involved in the low-level day-to-day staff operations of their departments, and if these lawyers vote to convict President Trump anyway, can those two lawyers be brought up on ethics violations to the NY bar association? Aren't they still officers of the court? Don't they still have a duty to the law even though they are sitting on a jury?
-PJ