Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

Idiotic pandering. So some deep thinkers in the GOP have caved to the media and other Democrats, and decided to make a futile effort to combat the media perception that being a pro-life Republican means being “anti-woman”.

Then they come up with this drivel, and in case anyone missed the real point they make certain to declare “you can absolutely be pro-life, pro-woman, and pro-family at the same time”. And anti-male, apparently. Another real smart move by the Stupid Party in an election year.

Of course they make sure a female senator takes the lead on this, because optics.

All of this is somehow meant to attract “pro-women” (i.e. pro-abortionist) voters. It won’t. The real women in this country, and those who support them, already vote the right way.


29 posted on 05/12/2024 8:54:25 AM PDT by PermaRag (Joo Biden is not my President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PermaRag

Nice points. It does put the Dems in a pickle though. The won’t vote for it because it’s an admission of life before birth, and their constituents will be upset that women won’t get more money from the father.


51 posted on 05/12/2024 10:25:01 AM PDT by LucienCA13 (sorry if you are microaggrieved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson