[FreeReign]

Oh, for crying out loud, this story has been out there for a long time. His presentation is known;

Just as I thought. You've seen no direct source nor did you hear his presentation directly.

His presentation is known; one doesn’t have to rehash it again to diminish, but one SHOULD address its accuracy it if ignorantly stating his conclusions as fact.

What?

[gloryblaze]

Try harder. I’ve heard the claims directly. They have been debunked. His conclusions were posted as fact. That is not good.