That was just one source. Here’s another. Take your pick.
So now you use as a source the Wisconsin Examiner. Its editors are "progressives" who list on the bio progressively biased publications.
I would pick a direct transcript of Peter Bernegger's presentation before the Assermbly Committee on Campaigns and Elections.
Do you have that?
Why haven't you linked to that?
Why are you so cocksure about what was is Bernegger's presentation without going to the original source?
There are two "tells" FOR Leftist propaganda in the words of the link itself:
"with little evidence"
"felon tells"
That's the Commie author Henry Redman trying to sway the audience from the get-go.
Why are you posting Commie claptrap on FR, gloryblaze?
I am reminded of two movies. One is dumb and dumber in which the girl tells him she wouldn't date him unless he was the last man on earth, to which he replies, "So you are saying there is a chance?"
The other movie is "Pirates of the Caribbean" When the British officer says "You are the worst Pirate I have ever heard of", to which Jack Sparrow replies, "So you have heard of me?"
The point here is that "little evidence" may indeed still be evidence.
We certainly have a *LOT* of evidence of election fraud in the various swing states. I've gone over so much of it, I've quit trying to keep up with it.
There were over 200,000 fake ballots in Maricopa County Arizona alone. Just the other day they mentioned that in Fulton County Georgia, 3,000 ballots were double scanned, (and so Election monitors have been appointed) and 1.4 million ballots do not match valid voters.
Yes indeed, it is a good idea to be wary, but we keep finding out about corrupt practices in the Democrat controlled cities of the swing states.
There is a website that keeps up with a lot of the election fraud information for the 2020 election. I believe it is called "Hereistheevidence.com"