[ScaniaBoy]

Unfortunately the website is not available to European readers, so could you, please, tell me how they explained that all the vote counts were equal despite some votes being double counted? (Every time irrespective of manual or machine counts??) It does not make sense. Maybe it is my little brain that is not up to this complicated Democrat and RINO vote mathematics…..

[Eagles6]

Magic🙄

[Eagle Forgotten]

“Unfortunately the website is not available to European readers, so could you, please, tell me how they explained that all the vote counts were equal despite some votes being double counted?”

The officials’ explanation is that the ballots were SCANNED twice but not COUNTED twice. Sometimes, when they fed a ballot into a scanner, it didn’t get scanned properly for some reason, so they tried again.

The obvious check would be to examine the list of people who signed in to vote. The number of such voters in a precinct should equal the total number of ballots counted in that precinct. I don’t know whether this was done.

[lepton]

so could you, please, tell me how they explained that all the vote counts were equal despite some votes being double counted? (Every time irrespective of manual or machine counts??)

---

They didn’t actually do a recount. They just re-reported their earlier results and changed a couple batch results so it wasn’t suspicious. There were found, in fact, in *partial* audits batches (usually around 100 ballots) which were very different in size from the marked counts, as well as at least one which was marked 100% Biden even though there were IIRC, about 20 Trump votes in the batch. Any actual recount would have caught those things regardless of any change in the outcome.