Skip to comments.
Harris: Supreme Court could threaten ‘fundamental freedoms’
The Hill ^
| 05.09.2024
| BRETT SAMUELS
Posted on 05/09/2024 11:56:10 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
A whole bunch of nothing comes out of her trap
To: ChicagoConservative27
Says the VP from the party that is threatening the freedom of law-abiding Americans.
2
posted on
05/09/2024 11:57:50 AM PDT
by
Major Matt Mason
(To solve the Democrat problem, the RINO problem must first be solved.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Harris has been the face of the White House’s response to the Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and set the stage for several GOP-led states to enact strict abortion bans. If anyone can screw up a potentially good issue for the Dems this fall, its Harris. With her at the lead, abortion won't even register as a voter concern by the time she is done her campaign.
3
posted on
05/09/2024 11:58:03 AM PDT
by
Opinionated Blowhard
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
The vice president said she didn’t want to raise any specific legal precedents the court could overturn because she didn’t want to sound “alarmist.”
Also, she has no idea what she is talking about. If she had actually been pressed to offer a specific example, she probably would have just started giggling like a retarded hyena.
4
posted on
05/09/2024 12:00:18 PM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: ChicagoConservative27
5
posted on
05/09/2024 12:01:31 PM PDT
by
Nextrush
(FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER REV. NIEMOLLER)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Sounds like insurrection.
6
posted on
05/09/2024 12:06:03 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Gee officer, driving 100 MPH is one of my recognized rights regarding fundamental freedom! Libs, you pick your recognized right and I’ll pick mine.
7
posted on
05/09/2024 12:07:25 PM PDT
by
Lockbox
(politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
To: ChicagoConservative27
A whole lot sure has gone in.
To: ChicagoConservative27
The big scare tactic barrage is gonna start happening.
The more it looks like Trump may pull off a second term, the more crazed the loonies are gonna get!
9
posted on
05/09/2024 12:15:17 PM PDT
by
bantam
To: ChicagoConservative27
they are willing to undo recognized rightsIt's all about killing babies.
10
posted on
05/09/2024 12:17:53 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: ChicagoConservative27
[SCOTUS] could “undo recognized rights And if SCOTUS did to "rights" that you so unsubstantiatedly and loosely claim, Ms Heels-up, it would be entirely within the limits of its jurisdiction and function.
Sit down, stop your fund-raising, and stop reading those big words prepared for you on the TelePromPTer!
11
posted on
05/09/2024 12:23:39 PM PDT
by
rx
To: ChicagoConservative27
States Rights. Period. As the Constitution dictates. IF you don’t like or Constitution, go to Cuba.
12
posted on
05/09/2024 12:36:46 PM PDT
by
silent majority rising
(When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: ChicagoConservative27
““But this court has made it very clear that they are willing to undo recognized rights,” she told the outlet.”
Miss “I tromp all over the law as AG to convict young black men of Marijuana possession?”
To: ChicagoConservative27
from the party that says trump will destroy democracy as they try to stop him from campaigning.
To: ChicagoConservative27
...like the freedom to own slaves?
15
posted on
05/09/2024 12:56:29 PM PDT
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Court has made it very clear that they are willing to undo recognized rights.
Like securing the border that is part of the oath Biden took?.
16
posted on
05/09/2024 1:04:35 PM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: ChicagoConservative27
I would say to K Mala (que mala): The Court already DID (today) kneecap a fundamental freedom provided by the 5th Amendment — they ruled that cops can keep your car a long time without due process (i.e., a reasonable prompt hearing).
17
posted on
05/09/2024 1:06:45 PM PDT
by
Migraine
( )
To: ChicagoConservative27
18
posted on
05/09/2024 1:22:39 PM PDT
by
broken_clock
(Go Trump! Still praying.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Maybe the heels up VP is just making sure other women can put heels up to kill their baby.
Harris obviously knows nothing about the Constitution and separation of powers.
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Chief Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
The rule must be discharged.
Source: 1 Cranch 137 (1803).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson