[Kathy in OC]

Maybe because California has 17 million registered voters and Indiana has only three million?

[bantam]

Like 3 million is insignificant, right??? Really?

[hanamizu]

Maybe because California has 17 million registered voters and Indiana has only three million?

---

Yes, California has 6x the number of voters, but one would assume that California would also have 6x the number of vote counters, so they should still take the same amount of time to count the votes. The fact is, the vote in the California Senate primary wasn’t finished in a month.

Consider if the national popular vote scheme were to occur. We wouldn’t have final election results for weeks. You know that some states would slow-walk their tallies until they knew how many votes it would take to ensure a democrat victory. Would other states have ‘standing’ to challenge?

[DesertRhino]

Then explain why Argentina with 24 million over 17 million in California could do it in a single day. And Florida does it in a single day despite 13 million votes. France does it in a single day with 48 million voters.

California is corrupt. It’s math.