They objected to Stormy being there, most likely based on lack of relevance to the criminal charge.
The Judge said no, she can testify, thinking that the Defense would object if Stormy got into lurid details.
Instead, the Defense just sat there and let Stormy say anything she wanted to say.
The Judge did nothing. He just sat there like a buffoon.
What will he do now - instruct the Jury to disregard Stormy's testimony?
The trial is over.
Instead, the Defense just sat there and let Stormy say anything she wanted to say. The Judge did nothing. He just sat there like a buffoon.
Generally, in order to have an appealable issue your objections must be timely or you risk waiver. In addition, an attorney who intentionally engages in ineffective assistance of counsel is engaging in a very dangerous game.
What do you mean the trial is over? Stop speculating and let’s see what is going on here. That was their and the corrupt judge playing hand. Let her lie and spew without stopping her to convince the jury who most likely will convict that she was raped. I don’t know about you all, but I’ve got a bad feeling about this. Trump doesn’t have a prayer with these corrupt POS double standard fixing the law to get a conviction bastards. I’m praying I am wrong and if I am, I will eat all the crow in the world. This trial might be over for Trump and that is not good. Unless you Heard something different than what I did. So elaborate.
That’s my thinking too. If the defense had constantly objected, the left/media would claim he “had something to hide” or was scared of what she had to say. They didn’t count on the defense letting her testimony go forward. IOW, Trump’s attorneys didn’t fall for the bait so now they’ve exposed the entire NYC judicial system as partisan frauds.