Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProgressingAmerica

I believe the “silent majority” was meant to be people who voted for the conservative candidate—but didn’t march in the streets screaming about it. They did/do indeed exist.

After Nixon was re-elected in 1972, leftist kook Pauline Karl (a “film critic”) lamented his landslide victory. She claimed nobody she knew voted for Nixon. Her attitude kind of illustrated how the elites view middle class Americans.


7 posted on 05/07/2024 8:06:12 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat

I know what people mean by the phrase. It doesn’t materialize in the real world though.

There isn’t any value in the fact that you won the election when you spend the next 729 days losing and losing and losing, over and over and over again.

Between each election there are 730 days.

The reality is (to keep this with the original post in regard to pro-life issues) that the only reason Roe ended up being overturned at all was not really because of Trump. It was because of the annual March for Life. They kept the issue in people’s minds. They did the hard work. They did not stop for 50 years. The March for Life is the unsilent majority, and they won because they kicked silence onto the ash heap of history where it belongs.

To borrow from my earlier analogy: The March for Lifers were not up in the bleachers. Sitting. Watching. Pointing. Complaining. Perhaps holding a bag of popcorn.

They got down into the field. In participation, they won the championship that year.


8 posted on 05/07/2024 10:15:40 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (The historians must be stopped. They're destroying everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson