Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Giuliani's Credit Card Reveals 'Unauthorized Payments': Court Filing
Newsweek ^ | Sean O’Driscoll

Posted on 04/30/2024 4:00:24 PM PDT by joesbucks

Rudy Giuliani has been making unauthorized payments on his credit card, a committee of his bankruptcy creditors have claimed.

They told a bankruptcy judge—who controls the former New York City mayor's spending—that they will not allow Giuliani to drive his creditors "off a cliff," and said they are making a last attempt to get him to comply with his obligations to the bankruptcy court before they start using tougher legal methods.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asusual; concerntroll; fakenews; giuliani; ibtz; joesdemocrat; joesdemocrats; joesnicolles; joestrolls; joeswallaces; joybehar; joyreid; lawfare; msnbconfr; nicollewallace; nicollewallaceonfr; persecution; pmsnbc; punishinggiuliani; punishingrudy; rudy; rudygiuliani; seanodriscoll; thelaptop; trolling; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: AnonymousConservative

Rudy admitted in court that his allegations were libelous and unproven. But he said he was entitled to say them on First Amendment grounds. This motion was denied as a half-guilty plea, which is not a thing.


61 posted on 05/01/2024 12:04:37 AM PDT by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

I am talking about before Trump was even a Republican. Giuliani was mainly a “Republican” because of law & order issues. He didn’t agree with many other issues.


62 posted on 05/01/2024 12:09:49 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yes, that is true as well. Rudy was always a liberal Republican who really was only anti-crime. He was never a social conservative, and often spoke against us. That’s in addition to him being a regular drag performer.


63 posted on 05/01/2024 12:24:53 AM PDT by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Who hell determines what one may purchase or not? You and millions of other dumbass Democrats (and cowardly RINOs) are the reason why this country is run by Biden type corrupt evil bastards.


64 posted on 05/01/2024 5:31:52 AM PDT by Chgogal (To paraphrase Biden: You vote Democrat? You ain't smart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

When you’ve bankrupted, until it’s discharged, you’re spending is under scrutiny by a trustee. While could could debate the civil court ruling, he voluntarily bankrupted to protect himself. That protection also has rules. Either he doesn’t understand them or he believes he’s above needing to follow them. And if he doesn’t like them, like his FL condo, he can challenge them.


65 posted on 05/01/2024 7:55:30 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks; Chgogal
We're fortunate that your "lawyer brother" is on speed dial for these legal discussions...  
66 posted on 05/01/2024 8:02:11 AM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

You aware of something different or are you just trolling? If you know something different, share it, please. My guess is you don’t.


67 posted on 05/01/2024 8:04:31 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
I'm aware that it isn't "your brother" dispensing legal bon mots.

And speaking of trolling, you've been at it pretty good this week.

68 posted on 05/01/2024 8:06:07 AM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

So no, you have nothing to offer but to troll and harass.


69 posted on 05/01/2024 8:08:32 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Claude would be very interested to find out what you’ve been up to these days...


70 posted on 05/01/2024 8:10:17 AM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Oh that's right! He is caught up in the Obama/Biden/RINO lawfare against Trump and his legal team. You and your cohorts are shameful.
71 posted on 05/01/2024 8:38:28 AM PDT by Chgogal (To paraphrase Biden: You vote Democrat? You ain't smart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

He cleaned up NYC and he broke the news of the h*nter b*den laptop to the world. He is conservative.


72 posted on 05/01/2024 8:57:54 AM PDT by ClarityGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
As I noted, you can quibble with the verdict, although Rudy’s defense became For the purposes of this hearing I admit the claims I made about those women were wrong, but my 1st amendment rights allow me to make false claims like that.

But it was he who sought BK protection. BK protection has rules and financial oversight. He’s an attorney. He should know about the advantages and disadvantages of BK protection. The court will decide if he’s allowed to do what he’s been doing or if it is a violation.

73 posted on 05/01/2024 9:24:10 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ClarityGuy; Chgogal
ClarityGuy wrote: He cleaned up NYC and he broke the news of the h*nter b*den laptop to the world. He is conservative.

That's why all the FR Democrat Party operatives on this thread are attacking him.

Payback for breaking the Hunter Biden laptop story.

Note the glee from pretend FR "conservatives" on this thread.

74 posted on 05/01/2024 9:53:37 AM PDT by kiryandil (Azov POW guys! Belgorod ground in 20 seconds! Bring your parade parachutes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks; Chgogal
For the purposes of this hearing I admit the claims I made about those women were wrong, but my 1st amendment rights allow me to make false claims like that.

In one of your Democrat Party courtrooms, your stooge Democrat "judges" would force Rudy Giuliani to recant a claim that the sun rises in the East, if it served their purposes.

Pure 1937 Soviet show trials.

75 posted on 05/01/2024 10:03:24 AM PDT by kiryandil (Democrat Party operatives! Attack Rudy to avenge the laptop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
Here’s Rudy’s problem.

https://news.google.com/search?q=Rudy%20admits%20he%20lied%20about%20ruby&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

That’s why he had to bankrupt. I think the admission was because he didn’t want to sit through depositions. That may have been more damaging.

76 posted on 05/01/2024 10:05:54 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Prove that. You can’t.


77 posted on 05/01/2024 10:06:53 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks; Chgogal; ClarityGuy
Prove that. You can’t.

I just proved that you're here to defend Democrat Party stooge-judges.

In your own words, Tommy.  

Exhibits A and B: stooge Engoron the Real Estate moron, and Colombian cartel stooge Juan Merchan.

These are the foetid piles of squeeze that you're defending for your DNC paymasters.

78 posted on 05/01/2024 10:14:15 AM PDT by kiryandil (Democrat Party operatives! Attack Rudy to avenge the laptop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

So you got nothing. Once again, thanks for playing…er trolling.


79 posted on 05/01/2024 10:26:33 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks; Lazamataz; Chgogal
Prove that. You can’t.

It took you less than a minute to respond like Nicolle Wallace or Philip Bump would have responded.

You should cease outing yourself as a Democrat Party operative.

As for your Colombian cartel clown Juan Merchan:

“Nothing in the courtroom last week dealt with the actual charges. None of the witnesses actually testified about any relevant crime recognized by law,” Jarrett explained to “Fox and Friends” co-host Steve Doocy. “Instead, it was sort of this weird kabuki theater or theater of the absurd, Steve. I mean, David Pecker, who ran the National Enquirer, was on the witness stand most of the week and told us what we already knew. The tabloid was sleazy, promoting and killing stories.”

80 posted on 05/01/2024 10:32:58 AM PDT by kiryandil (Democrat Party operatives! Attack Rudy to avenge the laptop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson