The American judicial clown show goes on and on and on...
Harvey will cast himself in “I Love NY” ads.
Perhaps the prosecutors shouldn’t have put on the women who were not part of the case. Dumb move.
From the article, “..finding the judge at the landmark #MeToo trial prejudiced the ex-movie mogul with improper rulings, including a decision to let women testify about allegations that weren’t part of the case.”
I am certain that allowing testimony on allegations not part of a case would be found to be prejudicial against a defendant no matter the politics of the judge. Remember it is the rights of the defendant that are protected under the Constitution. Even defendants who are scumbags.
I think enough evidence can be presented without such testimony that a new trial will easily lead to a conviction.