Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zeestephen

1. The private investment (and it will be privately run) is more than three times the public investment.

2. There are many times more annual S.Cal. visitors to Las Vegas as there are visitors between S.F. and S. Cal, making the new line more feasible - in terms of passenger revenues, than the stupid gpvernment built S.F. to L.A, line.

3. Most of what California is contributing is land along the I-15 right of way.

4. What AMTRAK and S.Cal. rail system will add will be a train hub in the Rancho Cucamonga area for both the new line from LasVegas and the existing train line that runs between San Bernardino and L.A.

5. Caveat - what they missed was a direct connection to the Ontario Airport on the south edge of Rancho Cucamonga.

This venture has tons more possiblity for success than the S.F. to L.A. line.


31 posted on 04/22/2024 1:36:31 PM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

JFTR, “privately run” doesn’t mean completely out of the fare revenue or private finance.


34 posted on 04/22/2024 1:40:03 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli; hinckley buzzard; who_would_fardels_bear

There you go, with facts ‘n stuff. That will never fly around here.

Danny Harmon takes a Brightline trip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1cwxUXzNp0


71 posted on 04/22/2024 9:17:45 PM PDT by Pelham (President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson