Replacement market? Maybe a black market for what was previously stolen from the store and others in the community.
Post notices to quickly loot before the close day, sure.
Sue the store as final insult.
NOWHERE in the legislation is anything suggested to stop the looting, arrest, jail, and convict the criminals that are causing the stores to leave.
Directive 10-289 is right around the corner.
-PJ
These BOTTOM RUNG goofyass politicians need to stay in their lanes. WHO THE HELL ARE THOSE AZHOS TO TELL A BUSINESSES THEY CAN’T CLOSE THEIR DOORS? These “supervisor” pimps need to grow up. They are not gods.
Quit looting the stores.
Problem: SOLVED.
Ayn Rand would be shocked how far we have fallen.
Announce the closing now. Then follow through.
Blatantly illegal. These pinkos are disgusting.
Because this law is just a proposal, if I had a market in SF I’[d close today and leave the state. Pre-ept the law being passed. SF is proving with this law that there is no reason to be in business in San Francisco
Scrape that place off the face of the Earth, and lets forget
it ever happened.
How about suing the city for not protecting the taxpayers from the dangers that the homeless crisis has caused? Throw out the democrats and it might get fixed.
Ohhh yeah, here we go.
Directive 10-289 to theoretically stop the economical decline. There are several severe implications of the Directive: all workers must remain in their present positions, neither resigning nor being fired; all businesses and industries must remain in operation; all patents and copyrights will be turned over to the government; no new devices or products may be produced or sold; all businesses will sell the same amount of goods and services as they have been selling; all people will be required to spend the same amount of money as they had previously; all wages and prices will be frozen; all decisions will be made by the Unification Board.
A fairly accurate synopsis of todays prog.
Targets, identical.
Tyrannical control, identical.
Bleedover from businesses to private individuals, identical.
Constant failures of communist central planning (DC), identical.
Inevitable death of millions, identical.
And the prog fav... ongoing, never ending wars, identical.
.
The problem is not the stores.
What about requiring the neighborhood residents meeting and working in good faith with the grocery store and stopping the shoplifting crime and retail thefts?
Every grocery store is suddenly considering closing now before this bill passes.
Because that would be ray-cist!
Regards,
You can’t force grocery stores to stay open. These people are lunatics.
Would you force employees to keep working in those stores in dangerous neighborhoods?
If you pass laws like this, you will never see another grocery store open in the community.
I remember something like that from Atlas Shrugged
Street tacos and Chicago
dogs.
Franshises are privately
owned. There’s no way
the gov demand that one
stays open.
And more time for lawyers to loot the system.
If this passes, every grocery store in San Francisco should close before the law goes into effect. If the law is written to take effect immediately they should close the day before the vote takes place.
Of course, the next thing that will happen is new stores will be opened with funds from Mexican cartels and with full approval of the same San Franciscan twerps who passed the new law. These new State/Cartel stores won’t have the shrinkage problem of the old stores because people who steal from them will be found floating the bay.