I reject every point in the article. Just last weekend I got together with old friends for a jeep trip. There were 5 young men who joined us. All married and highly productive and having kids. One was a welder who could fabricated anything. One mechanic, a police officer, a kid who went into property management, and a guy who is about 8 years along in a mortgage company as a salesman. Another started at a fire alarm and suppression systems company and has worked his way up to running a crew.
None wasted their time or money going to a place that hates them for indoctrination. All are healthy, happy and the kind of man you hope your daughter finds. None were soft and pasty.
Guess it’s a real bitch when the radfems build their sicko world and the dudes walk away.
Look at the reasons, males aren’t going into healthcare? What man in his right mind wants to go there anymore? It’s hard left, feminine, hyper socialized and authoritarian.
The country might miss out in tax revenues? Maybe they don’t see their duty as being a government ox.
Women are having a hard time finding mates that meet their expectations? Hilarious, cry me a river you unworthy city girl. Go get punched in the head and keep hooking up and prattling in about abortion. Guys have a hard time seeing you as a mother to their children.
Nice to see them panic at their Ted talks that males opted out of their authoritarian fever swamp.
The article was great comedy though.
College is where one learns STEM jobs. You can’t fake engineering or surgery.
I just finished reading Atlas Shrugged (again) and it sounds to me more like men are "Going Galt" with respect to college.
What guy wants to go to college where nobody wants him, and the environment makes no bones about letting males know how bad, toxic, and evil they are, actually codifying it into codes, policies, procedures, and baking it into the formal curriculums? Normal men aren't going to go for it, and the only ones who DO, are largely men who are men in chromosome structure only. And even then.
College is not about competency anymore. It is now about indoctrination and checking boxes. It is about fostering, in the words of Ayn Rand in her book "The Aristocracy of Pull".
The real world, where the rubber meets the road, where reality determines how competent you really are, is likely where more men are going.
It IS a problem though, because it means men are abandoning the managerial positions to females, and while I have worked for stellar female managers, overall, I don't like it at all.
And it means even more women in politics, the very fever swamp of the worst in human nature.
Orwell wrote this in 1984 and has taken much heat for it, and those criticizing him attribute it to misogyny. Anyone who has observed politics knows the truth of this:
"Winston had disliked her from the very first moment of seeing her. He knew the reason. It was because of the atmosphere of hockey−fields and cold baths and community hikes and general clean−mindedness which she managed to carry about with her. He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy."
And while it is absolutely, 100% not a blanket statement, there is truth in it comparatively speaking, and we will get a greater number of these types making policy in both government and business.
well-said
Well said.