Replies

“You were never going to get the Senate votes, despite the evidence. What the house did was fall short of evidence and most of the expectation fizzled. At the end of the day, it was more political than practical.”

You are joking right?

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/us-banks-flagged-over-150-transactions-involving-bidens-brother-or-son-for-further-review/

https://nypost.com/2023/05/10/how-the-bidens-used-shell-companies-to-enrich-themselves/

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/bidens-used-web-of-shell-companies-to-conceal-foreign-cash-bank-records-obtained-by-house-gop-reveal/

https://oversight.house.gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-biden-family-influence-peddling-timeline/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-family-received-more-than-24-million/ar-AA1hvhWK

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-family-received-millions-from-foreign-nationals-tried-to-conceal-source-of-funds-house-oversight/ar-AA1b06gG

Then there is Hunter's laptop.

And Bobulinski’s testimony.
https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/02/bobulinski_opening-statement.pdf

Then there was this; a telephone call that caused an impeachment, a son and an energy company and a VP who influenced peddled $1 Billion loan guarantee.

https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin/30181445.html

Nope. Any of your links should have been referred for indictment. They weren’t. Both Comer & Jordan have been shooting from the lip about how simple this would be and how quickly they’d get there. They’re not even sure they have the Republican votes to impeach. And there was never any way they’d have enough votes in the Senate. But I don’t think removal was the goal. They wanted Biden to enjoy the stain of impeachment.

Very good but there’s also Bobulinski’s opening statement and testimony from 3/20/24. He answered every question directly that was asked of him - as directly as ALLOWED!!! A treasure trove of information...