The problem is that they funded Al Nusra (as almost all funding goes to the most fundamentalist groups like AZOV, Muslim Brotherhood, and ISIS in Libya, because they get shite done).
Then Al Nusra disbanded and many reformed into ISIS with the money and weapons we provided, so later, right around the time ISIS started raping and murdering Yadzis, Obama started funding rebels to fight ISIS, who were then slaughtered because Obama was cautious to not give them the same fighting capabilities as he had done with Al Nusra.
And Al Nusra was only there because they wanted to install a pipeline with a puppet regime.
RE: Then Al Nusra disbanded and many reformed into ISIS with the money and weapons we provided,
So we UNINTENTIONALLY funded a group that eventually became ISIS and then fought the same group that we unintentionally funded to overthrow Assad.
So, how does that tie up with the accusation that we are now funding ISIS to attack Moscow last week? Exactly what does our government gain by doing this? I thought ISIS is now our enemy?