Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brownsfan

Why not? The assumed that the administrative state will bail them out when it fails horribly so what is the real risk?


6 posted on 03/14/2024 7:41:28 AM PDT by mikesmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: mikesmad

“Why not? The assumed that the administrative state will bail them out when it fails horribly so what is the real risk?”

The risk is getting in bed with a whore and expecting to be protected. Anyone putting their financial future in the hands of politicians who are risking nothing is just plain stupid.


8 posted on 03/14/2024 7:44:18 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mikesmad; brownsfan
Why not? The assumed that the administrative state will bail them out when it fails horribly so what is the real risk?

Don't forget the punishment aspect for not going along with the administrative state. No corporation wants to go through regulatory hell. Then there's the aspect of generational marketing; the car makers wanted to build street cred among Gen Z.

IMHO it'd probably be wise for a car maker to have maybe 10% of their products be EV to cater to that market. Analogous to most pickup buyers not needing a F-350 diesel, but some do. Likewise, most people aren't in a situation where buying an EV is practical, but some are.

30 posted on 03/14/2024 8:14:26 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson