Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Forgotten

Since the findings of the first trial were not allowed to be disputed, the second trial would need to be reheard.


32 posted on 03/08/2024 9:58:37 AM PST by Shanty Shaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Shanty Shaker

“Since the findings of the first trial were not allowed to be disputed, the second trial would need to be reheard.”

No, that’s not how it works. The applicable legal principle is called collateral estoppel. At the first trial, Trump had a full opportunity to dispute Carroll’s allegations. He doesn’t get a second bite at the apple. The jury at the second trial was instructed that the findings of the first jury (i.e., Trump did commit sexual assault) were binding.

Freepers don’t like it but that decision by Judge Kaplan was CORRECT on the law. An appeal on that basis will fail.

Trump’s best argument on appeal is that the huge verdict at the second trial was excessive and should be reduced. He’ll still owe Carroll millions but, he can hope, a lot less than he owes now. The judgments won’t be wiped out entirely.


36 posted on 03/08/2024 10:42:34 AM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson