Posted on 03/07/2024 4:34:41 PM PST by Morgana
The judge in Harry's visa case has Harry's paperwork now. And nobody is talking about the tax dodger issue.
Meanwhile Neal Sean is reporting that the Harkles were invited to Balmoral, but per the King can only come if they bring both kids.
If hardball is being played I can't believe KCIII is doing it, but it did make me curious about something...
I knew surrogacy is legal in CA, but check out the UK.
Surrogacy: legal rights of parents and surrogates
Surrogacy is legal in the UK, but if you make a surrogacy agreement it cannot be enforced by the law...
Holy moly. That may explain a lot, eh?
If so, then the Palace really IS playing hardball.
Exactly what first came to my mind!
This relatively harmless doofus is getting the third degree, while at the very same minute actual criminals and terrorists are being escorted into the country.
If either or both of those kids were born as the result of a surrogacy agreement, the Harkles could be sued for custody if they bring them to the UK.
Bet the Harkles, the Palace, and the surrogate mother/s all know this very, very well...
And ain’t this interesting, from last year.
Note the timing...
Wonder if it will be retroactive...
BTTT.
Per the above, Harry is indeed here on an A-1 visa.
Are the Harkles tax dodgers? Maybe in the UK, too...
Inquiring minds want to know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.